{
  "skill_name": "Agent Wallet",
  "skill_path": "./skills/clawhub-agent-wallet",
  "skill_directory": "./skills/clawhub-agent-wallet",
  "is_safe": false,
  "max_severity": "HIGH",
  "findings_count": 2,
  "findings": [
    {
      "id": "llm_finding_Agent Wallet_1",
      "rule_id": "LLM_UNAUTHORIZED_TOOL_USE",
      "category": "unauthorized_tool_use",
      "severity": "HIGH",
      "title": "Missing wallet.py Implementation Creates Tool Shadowing Risk",
      "description": "The instructions reference 'wallet.py' as a file that should exist in the skill package, but it is not found. This creates ambiguity about how the skill actually executes wallet operations. An attacker could exploit this by providing a malicious wallet.py implementation that shadows the expected behavior, potentially intercepting API keys, modifying transaction parameters, or exfiltrating data before forwarding requests to the legitimate API.",
      "file_path": "SKILL.md",
      "line_number": null,
      "snippet": "Referenced Files: Files referenced in instructions: wallet.py\n**Referenced File: wallet.py** (not found)",
      "remediation": "1. Include the complete wallet.py implementation in the skill package. 2. Implement integrity checks (checksums/signatures) for all skill files. 3. Document the expected behavior and interface of wallet.py. 4. Add validation that wallet.py exists and matches expected hash before execution. 5. Consider embedding the implementation directly in SKILL.md if it's simple enough.",
      "analyzer": "llm",
      "metadata": {
        "model": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
        "overall_assessment": "This Agent Wallet skill presents MODERATE to HIGH security risks primarily related to credential management and external service dependency. While the core concept of server-side private key management is sound, the implementation relies entirely on trust in an external API service with hardcoded endpoints. The API key becomes a critical credential that grants full wallet control within policy limits, yet secure handling mechanisms are not specified. The missing wallet.py implementation file creates ambiguity and potential tool shadowing risks. The skill would benefit from: (1) complete implementation files, (2) explicit secure credential storage mechanisms, (3) clearer trust model documentation, (4) server verification capabilities, and (5) abuse prevention measures. The skill is functional for its intended purpose but requires careful deployment with additional security controls.",
        "primary_threats": [
          "Data Exfiltration/Exposure (API key handling)",
          "Tool Exploitation (missing implementation file)",
          "Social Engineering (incomplete trust model disclosure)",
          "Availability Disruption (no rate limiting)",
          "Misleading Content (incomplete documentation)"
        ],
        "aitech": "AITech-12.1",
        "aitech_name": "Tool Exploitation",
        "aisubtech": "AISubtech-12.1.2",
        "aisubtech_name": "Tool Poisoning",
        "scanner_category": "SUSPICIOUS CODE EXECUTION",
        "meta_validated": true,
        "meta_confidence": "MEDIUM",
        "meta_confidence_reason": "The file is explicitly listed as referenced but not present. However, examining the skill content shows it's entirely curl-based instructions, so this may be a documentation error rather than a security threat. Downgraded from HIGH severity because there's no evidence of actual tool shadowing - just incomplete documentation.",
        "meta_exploitability": "Low - Would require attacker to inject a malicious wallet.py file, which isn't part of the skill's normal operation",
        "meta_impact": "Low - Confusion or documentation inconsistency, not active exploitation"
      }
    },
    {
      "id": "llm_finding_Agent Wallet_3",
      "rule_id": "LLM_SOCIAL_ENGINEERING",
      "category": "social_engineering",
      "severity": "MEDIUM",
      "title": "Incomplete Trust Model Disclosure",
      "description": "The skill description claims 'without ever exposing the private keys' which is technically true, but misleading about the actual security model. The API key provides equivalent access to the wallet as the private key would - it can authorize any transaction within policy limits. Users may have false confidence that their funds are more secure than they actually are, since compromise of the API key (which the agent handles) equals compromise of wallet control.",
      "file_path": "SKILL.md",
      "line_number": null,
      "snippet": "Description: 'without ever exposing the private keys'\nBut: 'apiKey' grants full transaction authority within policies\nThe security boundary is the API key, not the private key - this distinction is not clearly communicated.",
      "remediation": "1. Clearly document that API key compromise = wallet compromise within policy limits. 2. Explain the actual threat model: private key is server-side, but API key is client-side. 3. Provide guidance on API key protection equivalent to private key protection. 4. Add monitoring and alerting for suspicious API key usage. 5. Implement transaction confirmation mechanisms for high-value operations.",
      "analyzer": "llm",
      "metadata": {
        "model": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
        "overall_assessment": "This Agent Wallet skill presents MODERATE to HIGH security risks primarily related to credential management and external service dependency. While the core concept of server-side private key management is sound, the implementation relies entirely on trust in an external API service with hardcoded endpoints. The API key becomes a critical credential that grants full wallet control within policy limits, yet secure handling mechanisms are not specified. The missing wallet.py implementation file creates ambiguity and potential tool shadowing risks. The skill would benefit from: (1) complete implementation files, (2) explicit secure credential storage mechanisms, (3) clearer trust model documentation, (4) server verification capabilities, and (5) abuse prevention measures. The skill is functional for its intended purpose but requires careful deployment with additional security controls.",
        "primary_threats": [
          "Data Exfiltration/Exposure (API key handling)",
          "Tool Exploitation (missing implementation file)",
          "Social Engineering (incomplete trust model disclosure)",
          "Availability Disruption (no rate limiting)",
          "Misleading Content (incomplete documentation)"
        ],
        "aitech": "AITech-2.1",
        "aitech_name": "Social Engineering",
        "aisubtech": null,
        "aisubtech_name": null,
        "scanner_category": "SOCIAL ENGINEERING",
        "meta_validated": true,
        "meta_confidence": "MEDIUM",
        "meta_confidence_reason": "This is more about clarity than deception. The skill is honest about its architecture, but could be more explicit about the trust model and API key's role as the security boundary.",
        "meta_exploitability": "N/A - This is a documentation clarity issue, not an exploitable vulnerability",
        "meta_impact": "Low - Users might have incomplete understanding of security model"
      }
    }
  ],
  "scan_duration_seconds": 46.243510484695435,
  "duration_ms": 46243,
  "analyzers_used": [
    "static_analyzer",
    "behavioral_analyzer",
    "llm_analyzer",
    "trigger_analyzer",
    "meta_analyzer"
  ],
  "timestamp": "2026-02-01T08:59:18.251934"
}